I will blatantly rip-off Metafilter‘s link to this listing of the Top 100 Toys.
I had quite a few of these things growing up — tho’ my favorite was probably a Radio Shack “Electronic Experimenters” kit like this one:
This is the blog of a one Ben Wilson, a Louisville, Kentucky native who enjoys baseball, beer, music, bikes, things that fly and good food. By day he pushes pixels and makes the Internet happen for a local advertising agency. His wife, Kelly is an Ironman, and his baby Amelia is the cutest thing ever. |
I will blatantly rip-off Metafilter‘s link to this listing of the Top 100 Toys.
I had quite a few of these things growing up — tho’ my favorite was probably a Radio Shack “Electronic Experimenters” kit like this one:
After Bill O’Reilly (jokingly) referred to The Daily Show’s audience as “stoned slackers”, it would seem in actuality that O’Reilly’s audience is less-educated than the audience of The Daily Show.
I know a college education isn’t everything, but that certain refutes O’Reilly’s joking statement. It’s funny — I was watching “Fox & Friends” for a bit at the gym on Monday, as ESPN’s Sportcenter was showing football (yawn) highlights, and they interviewed Ed Schultz, a liberal talk-radio host, who used to be a conservative. He’s got a book out now, so he’s making the media rounds. They get to talking to him about his book, and quickly after a softball question or two, question him about a section in the book where he talks about his dislike of the Fox News Channel. I can’t find a transcript of that broadcast, so I’ll attempt to paraphrase… (click Read full story below)
Update: Check out this link ‘Daily Show’ viewers ace political quiz, and this quote.
“Daily Show” viewers are 78 percent more likely than the average adult to have four or more years of college education, while O’Reilly’s audience is only 24 percent more likely to have that much schooling.
Plus, the network noted, “Daily Show” viewers are 26 percent more likely to have a household income more than $100,000, while O’Reilly’s audience is only 11 percent more likely to make that much money.
So the guy watching Stewart may not only be smart, but may also be rich.
{more}
“Well, I don’t hate anyone, but you guys have an overwhelming number of conservative/Republic leaning commentators or this network, and you portray yourself as ‘Fair & Balanced’, so what gives?”. Steve Doocy (the co-host) retorts: “Well, you are on the show now, hawking your own book! Why are you here?”. Schultz replies: “You invited me here.” Later, Schultz is speaking to how well Fox News has done in capturing market share, and keep people coming back. Part of which, he believes, is due to Fox News’ portrayal of itself as “Fair and Balanced” and yet having a slate of nearly all conservatives as hosts and commentators, thereby duping the general viewing public. Either Doocy or his co-host Brian Kilmeade come back with: “So you think the American public is stupid, Ed?” Wow. Obviously, that is what he is saying!
It’s that kind of retort that truly disheartens me about the current culture of news media. “Raising the level of political discourse” in this country has been a banner for many people on both sides of the political landscape in this country for a while now, but really they are just feeding the filthy need for drama that “the average American audience” seems to love so much. “Reality shows” really arenrsquo;t reality so much as real situtations carefully crafted and put into motion by TV producers, and most politically-charged news media isnrsquo;t reality either, Irsquo;d say. Itrsquo;s just as fake, dramatic, and wildly entertaining as any reality show or professional wrestling.
Irsquo;m not a fan of either reality shows (mostly) or of professional wrestling, but I know people who are and they are (mostly) not idiots, but they like to be entertained in dramatic and exciting ways. TV has shown that itrsquo;s easy and cheap to produce these shows, so I guess it would follow that itrsquo;s easy and cheap to make dramatic and entertaining “political discourse” on the same level. But like I said, thatrsquo;s not reality. Itrsquo;s dramatized, entertaining reality. Politics shouldnrsquo;t be dramatized, sanded-down, simplified, or easy to swallow. Itrsquo;s our lot in life living in a democracy to be well-informed, and thanks to media outlets like Fox News, you can be fed just about anything and be entertained by some verbal catfights as well! How novel! Some people can see through the slick packaging and tasty morsels of drama, and some donrsquo;t. It just so happens that the former are more likely to be better educated than the latter. Go figure!
From a collection of Japanese cigarette PSA graphics, with
more here. I love you, Japan. I do.
Hey, that’s me!
Geoff has been helpind Odd Todd out with various and sundry flash games over the last couple of years, and they’ve finally released Mep Ball, a Kick-ups style game, and I was credited for beta-testing with ol’ Geoffy. Mostly, I played Mep Ball and tried to cheat a lot. It turned out very well — very fun indeed!
There is a website, it’s called SomethingAwful, and each Friday they publish a new themed “Photoshop” contest where they do amazing things with digital imagery. This has somehow caught on like wildfire, and even become VERY funny! And I’m not EVEN joking! Just take a look at this this entry for this weeks contest, which is based around reworking strips from a popular (ne’ classic) comic graphic novel, “The Watchmen”.
I loved The Watchmen, and having the crew at Something Awful take strips out of this classic graphic novel and re-work them in a way that only Something Awful can do is just dandy.